Debt vs. Equity
There has been a prolonged
argument as to which of the two Debt or Equity is better
for a company. The answer lies with the company and what they think
appropriate in terms of funding possibilities. Each of these has merits
over the other, but the decision lies with the investment seeker and
his/her analysis of the financial statements and what s/he prefers
in the end.
Debt Financing
Debt is in the form of a loan
to the organisation, either short term or long term, payable after
an agreed period of borrowing. The debt carries a cost of borrowing,
payable annually or as agreed over the period of borrowing. The
lender (creditor) holds no stake or control over the proceedings
of the business and does not have the right to participate in any
meetings between shareholders and the directors. The interest payable
to the lender is a tax allowable expense, but it must be paid regardless
of profit or less arising in the period concerned.
The demerits of using debt
as a source of finance are sometimes penalising. For instance, though
the lender does not have any say in the operation, the payment of
the interest on the loan holds priority over any dividends paid
to shareholders. A legal action can be taken to force liquidation
to collect the amount lent to the business, which must be repaid.
Since the finance is normally guaranteed against an asset held by
the business, a lender definitely has the upper hand in demanding
a payback.
Debts usually have a
low cost attached to them, especially long-term debts. As long-term
creditors bear the lowest risk, their investments being secured
against assets, they receive the lowest level of returns offered
by the company. Therefore, a higher amount of capital is collected
with a minimum return attributable to it; thus improving the cash
flow of the company. In addition, the interest payment provides
for a tax saving, as it is a tax allowable expenditure.
Equity Financing
Equity represents a shareholding
in the company, on a short or long-term basis. This is not a form
of borrowing but a permanent investment in the capital of the business.
The shareholders may exercise their right to have their word in
the operation of the business but not necessarily day-to-day. The
shareholders in a partnership (partners), are themselves the managers
of the business, but this may not be the case in private or public
companies. The shareholders are normally separate from the management
of companies (board of directors), who may themselves also own some
shares.
The shareholder may not demand
the investment back at any time, but may lose all or part of the
investment in the event of insolvency of the company, therefore
a higher risk is attached to each share held. The shareholder may
not receive his/her share of profits (dividends) until the financial
position depicts a sustained growth and expects a rise in future
earnings. A shareholder bears limited liability in the affairs of
the business and therefore, is not responsible for addressing any
business liabilities.
Equity investments are not
secured against the company assets and are prone to the highest
risk level within the company. This suggests that the shareholders
should receive a higher level of return to compensate for the risk
being undertaken. Dividends are an appropriation of profit and are
not tax allowable, compared to interest on debts. The dividends
are distributable after interest and corporation tax has been deducted
from operating profits. Then again, the company may feel that it
should transfer some of the profits to a reserve for future contingencies.
The remaining amount is then appropriated among the shareholders
net of 10% tax deductible at source.
As we have seen, each
of the major financing sources have their pros and cons but it is
up to the company to find the best combination to address the funding
requirement.
|